Court No. V, Case No. VII. an imperative necessity that such rules are established.1) The politicians did not succeed in establishing any standard r [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. of hostages? Could such a decision be just? I think such a decision would be contradictory to the most basic principles [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. In preparing this outline the prevailing theory of the science of international law has been taken as a basis. In its Bri [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. On the next two pages, 58 and 59, I have dealt with the legal concepts pertaining to reprisals and hostages, and I have di [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. tions of the laws of war can be deduced from the fact of the non-proportionality of the reprisal measures. Moreover, a de [ ... ]
I shall continue reading on Page 66. Even if one could assume that troops of the LXIX Reserve Corps had committed any acts, as claimed by the Prose [ ... ]
Should however reference as excuse to the higher authority not be regarded in general as permissible, then, in the case in question, as I have demon [ ... ]
Res. Inf. Reg. 45 referring to encroachments by the Cossacks. The incidents shown by these documents are not subject of the indictment. For this re [ ... ]
Likewise, the Prosecution witness von Bach-Zalewski testified also the division commanders took steps against the excesses committed by the Cossacks [ ... ]
in actual fact punished, and apparently the Prosecution wants to make General Dehner responsible for this also. Is this supposed to be a war crime o [ ... ]