Court No. V, Case No. VII. carried out, but a military necessary measure. Yamena was an important place for the partisan activities, accessible with [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No, VII. This is shown by the wording of the daily report, because this act of destruction was reported under the heading of "2nd U [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. "The Prosecution has also not provided proof that use was made of the authorization not to take prisoners contained in par [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. troops of the 69th Res. Corps would have had the rights of an occupation force. To be sure, the Prosecution has said in i [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No.VII. applied.1) According to Lauterpacht the rules governing martial law are also valid, without distinction, for wars which we [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. warring nations more and more to strict rules and to contribute to a humanization of war. I continue on page 49 at the to [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. Corps which was commanded by General Dehner in Croatia have the rights and obligations of an occupation force or not, and [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. which they had temporarily occupied for a short time. This is not shown either by any of the documents submitted by the Pr [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. As regards this, I particularly refer to the statements by Heyde1) and by Oppenheim-Lauterpacht. What General Dehner is c [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. For reprisals and hostages there are no standards in International Law. I already set forth in my Opening Statement that I [ ... ]