proved that it was an entirely justified reprisal measure. Here too I can save myself the trouble to discuss all documents once more. However, I w [ ... ]
evidence whatsoever has been submitted to prove this fact. None of the evidence submitted by the prosecution shows that troops commanded by General [ ... ]
it would rather endeavour to set the economy of that country on its feet and try to protect it from the ravages of war. The troops of the XVth Army [ ... ]
documents, which were submitted in this connection, show clearly that the troops of General von Leyser took prisoners. There are reports on prisone [ ... ]
troops cannot claim treatment as members of fighting forces. However, this viewpoint does not apply for the evaluation of the material submitted by [ ... ]
It is comparatively easy to prove that the reports submitted by the prosecution, concern battle incidents in the course of which the bandits were ki [ ... ]
which came to their knowledge and could be of significance to the higher command, this report does not prove at all, that these men were executed by [ ... ]
induce the Croat government or the Croatian army to take steps. I refer, in this connection, to the statements of my client on the witness stand, an [ ... ]
by the V SS-corps. This corps has, obviously, also suggested the reprisal measure, as results from the letter referred to. The V SScorps was not sub [ ... ]
and XXI A.K. Army Corps. The same is true of the supplement to the commando order referring to allied military missions, which was submitted by the [ ... ]