Court V Case VII see from these comparisons how untenable the position taken by the prosecution really is. In drawing such comparisons, you wi [ ... ]
Court V Case VII Field Marshal List could act on this basis. b) No plan existed to terrorize or deter the population. The terror order of 23 [ ... ]
f) The ten-day report (par. 5c) covering the period from 20 - 30 October 1941 could not longer reach Field Marshal List's knowledge due to his leav [ ... ]
in the alleged shooting of 2100 Jugoslav Prisoners of war (par 12d), in the order of General Boehme not to grant a pardon (par 12e), and in the arre [ ... ]
Field Marshal List left the service, so that this order can not be charged against Field Marshal List. f) Field Marshal List could also not have ha [ ... ]
prisoner collecting camps were to be transferred. This order went by teletype to the 342nd Division which was in charge of the evacuation of Sabac, [ ... ]
not take place because its rebuilding was stopped by an order dated 28 October of the Commanding General in Serbia in view of the fact that the terr [ ... ]
setting aside all misgivings, decided not to leave his responsible post as Commander of the Infantry School in order to be able, in this important p [ ... ]
List did while he was active in Poland and France has been raised against him. It was owing to the humane principles of Field Marshal List that the [ ... ]
May it please the Tribunal I now come to the final evaluation of the case: Through the development of the situation in the Balkans after the begin [ ... ]