here for cross-examination; or if the affiant happened to be in Nurnberg then Dr. Fritsch ought to produce him in lieu of the affidavit. Aside from [ ... ]
Now if Dr. Fritsch is merely to produce the affiant ButtlarBrandenfels to tell us that the Brandenburg Division was not in the Second Panzer Army, t [ ... ]
Court V, Case No. VII. MR. RAPP: Your Honor, if I may say something please, we are perfectly willing to stipulate with [ ... ]
Army from the Second Panzer Army. This teletype bears the date 1st of January 1944, and as the date of receipt the 2nd of January 1944. Since the p [ ... ]
A. No, at that time I stated the following. When I came to a situation conference, the Ic reported that the Division [ ... ]
this original copy didn't even bear the initials of my chief of staff, not to speak of mine. And as regards the subordination relation, the Divisio [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. Q And now just one concluding question in this case. Did the operation actually take place [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. therefore I am only now in a position to refute these statements in sur rebuttal. I would ask that I might be allowed to [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. witness. PRESIDING JUDGE BURKE: Very well. MR. RAPP: With [ ... ]
Court No. V, Case No. VII. A Yes, that is correct, but the Division which gave this order, or this information here, w [ ... ]