We just simply stated one theory in order to have that document admitted. Its value of course is for the Tribunal to determine. As far as the indi [ ... ]
DR. TIPP (For General von Leyser): Your Honor, if I understood Mr. Fenstermacher correctly, he offered this Order aga [ ... ]
Dehner. MR. GAWLIK: Your Honor, in answer to this I would like to state this is not a conclusion argument but a ques [ ... ]
Sauter would clarify that matter? DR. MENZEL: I join the objection because I also do not know my client was ever ass [ ... ]
DR. MUELLER TORGOW (Counsel for the defendant Felmy): Your Honor, I don't know where it is supposed to be seen that t [ ... ]
or the destruction of the order with in the present area of any of the defendants involved in this proceedings? MR. FENSTERMA [ ... ]
theory is correct, that we can rebut general testimony with similarly general testimony, then I submit that it goes to the credibility of all the de [ ... ]
has no basis at all. We know that the admissability of such documents at all is only a special case in these Occupation Courts, and that in America [ ... ]
DR. SAUTER (Counsel for the defendant Lanz): Mr. Fenstermacher has stated that this document is also submitted agains [ ... ]
during the night 1/2 July 1944. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - During the night 1/2 July 1944 the strong - point "MORGE [ ... ]