of the reprisal was already reported under the 13 March 1944. General Speidel was on sick leave from 23 January till 17 March 1944 in Germany. This [ ... ]
b) General Krech was commander of the 41. Fortress Division, consequently Commander of Troops. According to the order Loehr reprisals belonged to th [ ... ]
Summarizing, I arrive at the conclusion that the prosecution has submitted no evidence proving General Speidel's responsibility for the carrying out [ ... ]
b) The military administration did not materialize, as the Greek government received basic instructions from the "Special Commissioner of the German [ ... ]
really nothing to do with retaliatory measures, as, unlike me, he had almost no troops. The competence and responsibility of the military commander [ ... ]
In No. 7 of the indictment ail defendants are changed with the wanton destruction of cities and villages. The individual cases mentioned under no. 9 [ ... ]
the commander of that division, Major General Drum stated under oath. General Eisenbach also declared under oath and in an affidavit to that effect [ ... ]
Therefore, Saukel had become the head of all labor allocation in the occupied territories. Saukel was, however, placed outside of the military and m [ ... ]
recruiting offices. Beyond this, the defense submitted also a number of exhibits supporting and positively confirming the fact that Saukel's labor r [ ... ]
And then Prosecution refers to NOKW-692, Exhibit 422, against General Speidel. Firsts, there is no evidence that the measure was ordered by the Mil [ ... ]