A note dated Berlin, 26 September 1942, for the attention of defendant Rothenberger, signed by defendant von Ammon, stated that by order of the Reich Minister the hitherto.
"exclusive jurisdiction of the Special Courts over NN cases is to some extent to be replaced by the People's Court of Justice."
A letter dated 14 October 1942 to Minister of Justice Thierack from Freisler, then President of the People's Court, states that he understood that a conference held on 14 October 1942 extended the jurisdiction of the People's Court over NN cases. Freisler states that he conducted the preliminary proceedings with Ministerial Director Lehmann of the OKW with regard to the ministry of Justice taking over the Night and Fog proceedings. He explains that the Night and Fog proceedings were top secret and no file or records were made in order to be quite sure that under no circumstances should any information be obtained by the outside world with regard to the fate of the alien prisoners. He also emphasizes the fact that under no circumstances could any other sentence than the one proposed by the Public Prosecutor be passed and to make sure of this in the technical routine it was decided that "1. The prosecutor should be entitled to withdraw the charge until the pronouncement of the sentence.
"2. The court was to be instructed to give the prosecutor another chance to give his point of view, in case their view should diverge from his."
Freisler further states:
"In fulfillment of my promise I deemed it necessary to inform you of this, dear Sir, as these facts were not permitted to be recorded in the files and are probably unknown in the department."
By his supplemental directive of 28 October 1942, Thierack made note of the fact that the "jurisdiction of the People's Court (No. 1, 1 and 2 of the additional circular directives of the 14th of October 1942)" had been extended to NN cases.
Thierack's letter, dated 25 October 1942 to defendant Lautz, copy to von Ammon, established and expanded jurisdiction of the People's Court over NN cases.
Thereafter the People's Court handled many Night and Fog cases, convicting the accused in secret sessions with no records whatsoever made of any evidence adduced and no record was made of the sentence pronounced. The defendant von Ammon testified that about one-half of the Night and Fog prisoners tried by the People's Court were executed.
Later NN cases were sent to the Special Court at Hamm, to German Special Courts at Breslau and Kattowice, Poland, and to Silesia and other places as will be later shown herein.
Concentration Camps The use of concentration camps for NN prisoners was shown by a letter dated 18 August 1942, signed by Gluecks, SS Brigadefuehrer and General-Major of the SS, which contained enclosures for information and execution by officials in charge of concentration camps, including Mauthausen, Auschwitz, Flossenbuerg, Dachau, Ravensbruck, Buchenwald, and numerous others.
The letter states that such prisoners will be transferred under the Keitel decree from the occupied countries to Germany for transfer to special courts. Should that for any reason be impossible, the accused will be put into one of the above-named concentration camps. Those in charge of the camps were instructed that absolute secrecy of such prisoners' detention was to be maintained including the prevention of any means of communication with the outside world either before or after the trial.
The following is illustrative of inhumane prison conditions for NN prisoners.
The affidavit of Ludwig Schirmer, warden in the prison at Ebrach, confirmed by his oral testimony, states:
"The Erbach prison which was used for criminal convicts had a capacity of 595 prisoners. In 1944, however, the prison became overcrowded and finally held a maximum of from 1,400 to 1,600 prisoners in 1945.
"This crowding had been caused by numerous NN prisoners from France and Belgium. Among them was the French General Vaillant who died in the prison of old age and of a heart disease. Owing to the overcrowding of the penitentiary, it was impossible to avoid the frequent outbreak of diseases, such as pulmonary tuberculosis, consumption and, of course, many cases of undernourishment. The very poor medical care was a serious disadvantage; the doctor showed up only two or three times a week. Sixty-two inmates died during the last months of the war. Many of them, of course, came in already sick. During the last months, a criminal convict was employed as physician. He was a morphinomaniac and a man of very low character.
"Although there were stocks of food at hand, the feeding of prisoners was bad; people got only soup and turnips for weeks. NN prisoners were crowded together, four in a single cell. From time to time a certain number of the prisoners was transferred to the concentration camp."
The affidavit of Joseph Prey, head guard at the Amberg prison, confirmed by his oral testimony, states that foreigners, Jews and NN prisoners at Amberg prison, which had a capacity of 900 to 1,100 were incarcerated there. Yet shortly before the collapse there were 2,000 prisoners, of whom 800 to 900 prisoners were Polish, and NN prisoners who included Frenchmen, Dutchmen, and Belgians. From time to time by secret decree prisoners were transferred to the concentration camp at Mauthausen. Defendant Engert, the official representative of the Department of Justice, visited and officially and inspected the prison and knew of these conditions.
By his affidavit Engert states that Thierack told him the Night and Fog prisoners had to be treated with special are caution, not allowed any correspondence, locked up hermitically from the outer world, and that care should be taken that their real names remain unknown to the lower prison personnel. Engert further states that these orders were the result of the Fuehrer Decree of 7 December 1941 and that Thierack told him the Night and Fog prisoners were accused of resistance and violence against the armed forces. He did not know what became of these NN prisoners at the various prison camps. He did know that an agreement existed with the Gestapo that the bodies of Night and Fog prisoners should be given to them for secret burial. It was shown by other testimony that defendant Engert was Ministerial Director; who handled and investigated the Night and Fog prisoners and that he was in charge of the task of transferring prisoners and knew their nationality and the character of crime charged against them.
On 14 June 1944 defendant von Ammon wrote Bormann, Chief of the Party Chancellery, a letter sent by way of defendant Mettgenberg, requesting permission of the Fuehrer to inform NN women held under death sentence of the fact that such sentence has been reprieved; since he considers it to be unnecessarily cruel to keep these "condemned women" in suspense for years as to whether their death sentence will be carried out.
Mrs. Solf, the widow of a former distinguished German cabinet officer and ambassador, testified that she was tried and held as a political prisoner of the Nazi regime for several years in Ravensbruck concentration camp and other prisons where a large number of foreign women were imprisoned. Concerning the ill treatment of these women and the prison conditions under which they were incarcerated, Mrs. Solf testified:
"As to the prisoners who were with me at Ravensbruck, as far as I can remember there was only an Italian woman of Belgian descent who was treated well, better than we were. However; in the penitentiary of Cottbus, as well as in the prison of Moabit, I met many foreigners. In the penitentiary of Cottbus; there alone were 300 French women who were sentenced to death, and five Dutch women sentenced to death who, after a week or two, were pardoned to penitentiary terms and who I saw in the courtyard. The 300 French women sentenced to death were sent to Ravensbruck at the end of November 1944. The night before they were transported they had to sleep on a bare stone floor. One of the auxilliary wardens, who was also an interpreter for them and who had a great deal of courage and a kind heart, came to me in order to ask us political prisoners to give them our blankets, which we certainly did."
She further testified:
"I know and have seen for myself that, for instance, in Moabit, some of the brutal wardens kicked them and shouted at them for reasons which seemed very, very unjust because these women did not understand what they were supposed to do."
The Night and Fog Decree was from time to time implemented by several plans or schemes, which were enforced by the defendants. One plan or scheme was the transfer of alleged resistance prisoners, or persons from occupied territories who had served their sentences or had been acquitted to concentration camps in Germany where they were held incommunicado and were never heard from again. Another scheme was the transfer of the inhabitants of occupied territories to concentration camps in Germany as a substitute for a court trial. Defendant Engert, as Vice President of one division of the People's Court, made such an order.
Trials Under NN Decree The evidence establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that in the execution of the Hitler NN decree the Nazi regime's Ministry of Justice, special courts, and public prosecutors agreed to and acted together with the OKW and Gestapo in causing to be arrested, transported to Germany, tried, sentenced to death and executed, or imprisoned under the most cruel and inhumane conditions in prisons and concentration camps, thousands of the civilian population of the countries overrun and occupied by the Nazi regime's military forces during the prosecution of its criminal and aggressive war.
The trials of the accused NN persons did not approach even a semblance of fair trial or justice. The accussed NN persons were arrested and secretly transported to Germany and other countries for trial. They were held incommunicado. In many instances they were denied the right to introduce evidence, to be confronted by witnesses against them, or to present witnesses in their own behalf. They were tried secretly and denied the right of counsel of their own choice, and usually denied the aid of any counsel. No indictment was served in many instances and the accused learned only a few moments before the trial of the nature of the alleged crime for which he was to be tried. The entire proceedings from beginning to end were secret and no record was allowed to be made of them. These facts arc proved by captured documents and evidence adduced on the trial, to some of which we now advert.
The first trial of NN cases took place at Essen. A letter from the prosecutor, dated 20 August 1942, addressed to the Reich Minister of Justice, was received on 27 August 1942, states that five defendants were to be tried and that two of them were to get prison terms and that "in the remaining cases the death sentence is to be ordered and inquiries made whether they should be executed by the guillotine."
These sentences were later pronounced.
In response to several inquiries from prosecutors at Special Courts in Hamm, Kiel, and Cologne citing pending NN cases, the defendants Mettgenberg and von Ammon replied that inview of the regulation for the keeping of NN trials absolutely secret defense counsel chosen by NN defendants would not be permitted.
In these same inquiries, it is stated that if defense counsel were carefully selected from those who were recognized as unconditionally reliable, pro-State and judicially efficient lawyers, no difficulty should arise with respect to the secrecy of such proceedings. It is suggested that if an attorney should inquire concerning representation of an NN defendant, he should be informed that it is not permissible to investigate whether or not there was any proceeding pending against the accused. This inquiry related to 16 NN French defendants who were to be tried at Cologne. Other evidence introduced in the case showed that this practice was followed.
The Foreign Countries Department of the Wehrmacht High Command reported to defendant von Ammon on 15 October 1942 a list of 224 alleged spies arrested in France in the execution of what was known as "Action Porto", of whom 220 had already been transported to Germany. Inquiry was made whether these prisoners should be regarded as coming under Hitler's NN Decree. A later directive issued 6 March 1943, which was initialed by defendant Mettgenberg and sent to the SS Chief Himmler, states that orders and regulations covering NN prisoners in general will be applied to Porto Action groups. The circular decree states further that in case of death of Porto Action prisoners, the same procedure is followed with respect to secrecy as is followed in NN cases, and that the estates of Porto Action prisoners are to be retained by the penal institution for the time being, and that relatives are not to be informed about the death of such prisoners, especially not of their execution.
A letter dated 9 February 1943, Berlin, to the President of the People's Court, Chief Public Prosecutor at Kiel and Cologne and Chief Public Prosecutor at Hamm, states that for the purpose of carrying out the Night and Fog decree or directive:
"In trials (before the Landesgericht), in which according to the regulations, defense counsel has to be provided for the defendant, the regulation may be ignored when the president of the court can conscientiously state that the character of the accused and the nature of the charge make the presence of a defense counsel superfluous."
In connection with the foregoing matter, a secret note to defendant von Ammon, dated 18 January 1941, suggests that a regulation concerning counsel for NN prisoners should be drafted. A letter dated 4 January 1943 states that in accordance with the power granted under the Fuehrer's order of 7 December 1941:
"Article IV, paragraph 32 of the Competence Decree of 21 February 1940 (relating to appointment of defense counsel) is cancelled. The President of the Court will order defendant to be represented only if he is unable to defend himself or for any special reason it seems desirable that defendant should be represented."
A letter dated 21 April 1943, Berlin, by Thierack, Minister of Justice, states that "Your ordinance of 21 December 1942 decreed that in criminal cases concerning criminal actions against the Reich and the occupation authority in the occupied territories, defense counsel of one's own choice should not be approved of on principle."
A letter by Thierack to the President of the People's Court, Berlin, dated 13 May 1943, states that "The directives given by the Fuehrer on 7 December 1941 for the prosecution of criminal actions committed against the Reich or the occupation authorities in the occupied territories are applicable, according to their meaning and their tenor, to foreigners only, and not to German nationals or provisional Germans."
A Draft of an extensive secret order or directive of the Reich Minister of Justice, dated 6 March 1943, covering secret NN procedure was sent to and initialed by or for heads of Ministry Divisions III and IV (the defendants Mettgenberg and von Ammon), Division V (headed by defendant Engert), and Division VI (headed by defendant Altstoetter). The directive instructed all so concerned to take further measures "in order not to endanger necessary top secrecy of NN procedure". Separate copies of this order, dated 8 March 1943, were sent to the aforementioned Ministry Divisions, including Division VI, headed by defendant Altstoetter, who admits having seen and executed the directive, to defendant von Ammon and to, among others, the Chief Reich Prosecutor at the People's Court (defendant Lautz), the Attorneys General in Celle, Duesseldorf, Frankfurt on Main, Hamburg, Hamm, Kiel, and Cologne and the Attorney General at the Prussian Court of Appeal and for the attention of Presidents of the People's Court, District Courts of Appeal of Hamm, Kiel, and Cologne, and the Prussian Court of Appeals at Berlin. Among the measures of secrecy included in the order or directive were the following:
"The cards not used for investigations for the Reich criminal statistics need not be filled in. Likewise, notification of the penal records office will be discontinued until further notice. However, sentences will have to be registered in lists or on a card index in order to make possible an entry into the penal records in due course.
"In case of death, especially in cases of execution of NN prisoners, as well as in cases of female NN prisoners giving birth to a child, the registrar must be notified as prescribed by law. However, the following remark has to be added:
'By order of the Reich Minister of the Interior, the entry into the death (birth) registry must bear an endorsement, saying that examination of the papers, furnishing of information and of certified copies of death (birth) certificates is only admissible with the consent of the Reich Minister of Justice.'" Division VI headed by defendant Altstoetter handled matters relating to registration of deaths and births.
The order further provides:
"Farewell letters by NN prisoners as well as other letters must not be mailed. They have to be forwarded to the prosecution who will keep them until further notice.
"If an NN prisoner who has been sentenced to death and informed of the forthcoming execution of the death sentence desires spiritual assistance by the prison padre, this will be granted.
It necessary, the padre must be sworn to secrecy.
"The relatives will not be informed of the death and especially of the execution of an NN prisoner. The press will not be informed of the execution of a death sentence, nor must the execution of a death sentence be publicly announced by posters.
"The bodies of executed NN prisoners or prisoners who died from other causes have to be turned over to the State Police for burial.
Reference must be made to the existing regulations on secrecy. It must be pointed out especially that the graves of NN prisoners must not be marked with the names of the deceased.
"The bodies must not be used for teaching or research purposes.
"Legacies of NN prisoners who have been executed or died from other causes must be kept at the prison where the sentence was served."
Later, in some instances the right to spiritual assistance was denied and a later directive authorized the turning over of bodies of NN persons to institute for experimental purposes.
A letter dated 3 June 1943, from the Reich Ministry of Justice to the People's Court Justices and the Chief Public Prosecutors, initialed by defendant Mettgenberg, deals with the subject of trials under the NN decree of foreigners who were nationals of other countries than those occupied by the Nazi forces. The difficulty obviously involved a violation of international law as to such nationals of other countries. In particular, the difficulty arose as to the regulation for the maintenance of secrecy of such trials and whether the secrecy with regard to NN cases should apply. The reply was that they were to be tried in accordance with the circular decrees of 6 February 1942 and 14 October 1942, and the regulations issued for the amendment of these circular decrees to be entitled "NN Prisoners Taken By Mistake". This decree provides that if the trial of such foreigners could not be carried out separately from the trial of the nationals of the occupied countries for reasons pertaining to the presentation of evidence, then the trials were to be strictly in accordance with the provisions of NN procedure; otherwise said foreign nationals would obtain knowledge of the course of the trial against their accomplices.
A note signed by the defendant von Ammon, dated 2 October 1947, states that NN prisoners were often ignorant of charges against them until a few moments before the trial. He further states that Chief Reich Public Prosecutor Lautz asked him whether there were any objections to the translation of the indictment into the language of the defendant, which would then be handed to him.
Defendant von Ammon replied that there would be no objection to the proceeding and states:
"It proved rather awkward that defendants learned the details of their charges only during trial. Also, the interpretation by defense counsel is not always sufficient because their French mostly is not good enough and defendants were brought to the place of trial only shortly before it was held."
The same difficulty arose as to Czech defendants.
A report on a conference with respect to new procedure in treatment of Night and Fog cases originating in The Netherlands, signed "von Ammon" and "Mettgenberg, 9 November 1943", addressed to Ministerial Director Engert and others, states that while returning from The Hague to Berlin the undersigned representative of the Reich Ministry of Justice held on 5 November as scheduled, a conference with the head officials of the Court of Appeals at Hamm and that defendant Joel thought the housing of NN prisoners, also such of Dutch nationality at Papenburg, would be possible and unobjectionable. This was later carried out.
A Secret letter dated 29 December 1943, addressed to defendant von Ammon from the Presiding Judge and Chief Prosecutor of Hamm Court of Appeals notified von Ammon of an imminent conference concerning transfer of the NN trials to the NN Special Courts.
A letter from Breslau dated 10 January 1944, signed by Dr. Sturm, asks that Ministerial Director defendant von Ammon be available for a meeting at Breslau between the 15th and 31st of January 1944 to discuss routine proceedings for handling NN cases.
A Letter addressed to the German Commander of the French Occupied Zone states that effective from 15 November 1943 all cases of crimes committed against the Reich or the occupation forces in occupied French zones hitherto submitted to the ordinary legal authorities were to be taken over by the Special Court and Attorney General in Breslau.
The defendant von Ammon attended conferences with Public Prosecutors in Breslau and Kattowice (Poland) on 18 and 19 February 1944, concerning housing of NN prisoners and possibility of transferring NN cases from The Netherlands, Belgium, and Northern France to special courts in Poland for trial; von Ammon reported the results of these conferences in detail to, among others, the defendant Klemm (Under-Secretary) and personally wrote on his report that he had secured appropriate Gauleiters' concurrence to the proposed transfer. Shortly thereafter the Ministry of Justice issued a decree endorsed to the defendant Mettgenberg for signature, and submitted twice to von Ammon for information and cosignature, whereby these Dutch, Belgian, and Northern French NN cases were to be transferred to Silesia for trial. In response to this decree, von Ammon was personally notified that the defendant Joel (then General Public Prosecutor at Hamm) feared objections from the Wehrmacht because of the longer transportation involved in the transfer.
A directive by the Reich Minister of Justice with respect to treatment of NN prisoners, dated Berlin, 21 January 1944, initialed by defendant von Ammon, to the President of the People's Court, to the Reichsfuehrer SS, Reich Prosecutor of the People's Court (defendant Lautz), to the Chief Public Prosecutor at Hamm (defendant Joel), and others, states that when an NN prisoner had been acquitted by a general court if it appears that the accused is innocent or if his guilt has not been established sufficiently, then he has to be handed over to the secret police. The directive further states:
"If in the main trial of an NN proceeding it appears that the accused is innocent or if his guilt has not been sufficiently established, then he is to be handed over to the Secret State Police; the Public Prosecutor informs the Secret State Police about his opinion whether the accused can be released and return into the occupied territories, or whether he is to be kept under detention. The secret State Police decide which further actions are to be taken.
"Accused who were acquitted or whose proceedings were closed in the main trial, or who served a sentence during the war, are to be handed over to the Secret State Police for detention for the duration of the war."
A letter dated 21 January 1944, Berlin, to the OKW and the Judge Advocate General Department, dispatched 22 January 1944 (copy to Ministerial Director Mattgenberg with request for approval) complains of lack of coordination in NN cases between military courts and justice officials. This complaint relates primarily to transfer of NN cases.
In answer to the objections to the transfer of NN cases arising in France from Cologne to Breslau, dated 18 January 1944, the defendants Mettgenberg and von Ammon insisted that the transfer is necessary and directed its accomplishment. Three days later a letter endorsed by Mettgenberg informed Himmler that this transfer of NN cases had taken place.
On 24 April 1944 von Ammon reported in detail on a trip he made to Paris previously referred to. This official visit served particularly to obtain information of the security situation in France and to determine whether the NN procedures of the Breslau Special Court were approved by the Army. This meeting occurred in the office of the Chief Justice of the German Military Governor of Paris, General von Stulpnagel. Von Ammon submitted this report both to Klemm and Mettgenberg who initialed it.
A letter from Hamm (Westphalia), 26 January 1944, to the Reich Minister Thierack, signed by defendant Joel, suggests the speeding up of proceedings to avoid delays in NN cases, and suggests that:
"The Chief of Public Prosecutor submits record to the Chief Reich Prosecutor only if, according to previous experience or according to directives laid down by the Chief Reich Prosecutor, it is to be expected that he will take over, or partly take over the case.
"As a rule, even now when the draft of the indictment is submitted for approval to the Reich Minister of Justice, the records are not enclosed. The decision rests with me, to whom the documents are brought by courier."
A note signed by Dr. Reicholt, 20 April 1944, to defendant von Ammon, expresses the same difficulty experienced by defendant Joel and asks that Chief Public Prosecutor at the People's Court decide quickly which of the accused persons he wanted to keep so that they may be transferred as quickly as possible.
The foregoing requests for speed in handling NN cases were due to disturbances caused by air raids.
The Reich Minister of Justice replied, 26 April 1944, that in the main "the delay in the proceedings is unavoidable".
Defendant von Ammon reported on a conference with German occupying forces of Belgium and Northern France, held in Oppeln on 29 and 30 June 1944. Von Ammon stated that since the Allied invasion had not caused undue tension as yet, it was unnecessary at that time to make penalties in NN cases more severe. This report was initialed by defendant Mettgenberg.
Disposition of NN Cases A statistical survey of NN cases as of 1 November 1943 made to Ministerial Director Dr. Vollmer, Berlin, 22 November 1943, shows cases and sentences passed on NN prisoners as follows:
1. Turned over by the Wehrmacht authorities to Senior Public Prosecutors at Kiel, 12 cases with 442 defendants; at Essen, 474 cases with 2,613 defendants; at Cologne, 1,169 cases with 2,185 defendants.
2. Charges filed by Senior Public Prosecutors as follows: At Kiel, nine cases with 175 defendants; at Essen, 254 cases with 860 defendants; at Cologne, 173 cases with 257 defendants; by Chief Public Prosecutor at the People's Court (Lautz), 111 cases with 494 defendants.
3. Sentences passed by Special Courts at Kiel, eight on 168 defendants; at Essen, 221 cases with 475 defendants; at Cologne, 128 cases with 183 defendants; at People's Court, 84 cases with 304 defendants.
The defendant von Ammon testified that about one-half of all defendants tried by the People's Court were given the death penalty and were executed. The foregoing document shows that defendant Lautz was Chief Public Prosecutor at the People's Court at the time the 304 sentences were pronounced in the Night and Fog cases.
A similar survey, five months later (30 April 1944), shows that a total of 8,639 NN defendants transferred to the various Special Courts and the People's Court in Germany, 3,624 were indicted and 1,793 were sentenced. Defendant von Ammon initialed this survey.
The foregoing statistical reports are obviously incomplete. They do not show the number of NN cases tried at Hamm, Breslau, Kattowice, and other places. The foregoing documents show that at these places great difficulty was experienced because of lack of prisons for the large number of NN prisoners who were sent to these areas. Nor do they show the number of NN prisoners committed to concentration camps without trial. They do not show the number of residue NN prisoners who were at the end of the control of NN matters by the Minister of Justice committed to concentration camps and never heard from thereafter.
THE PRESIDENT: The electrical transcription is temporarily out of commission. We will recess for ten minutes.
(A recess was taken.)
THE MARSHAL: The Tribunal is again in session.
JUDGE BLAIR: Judge Blair continuing reading:
Use of NN Prisoners in Armament Industry In file of reports for the years 1943 and 1944 of NN cases still pending in the Ministry of Justice, the Attorney General at Kattowice (Poland) stated to the Ministry of Justice the following:
"NN -- (Nacht und Nebel) prisoners held within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal of Kattowice are already employed to a large extent in the armament industry, regardless of whether they are being held for questioning or punishment. They are quartered there in special camps at or near the place of the respective industrial enterprise. In this way it is intended, if possible, to place all NN prisoners at the disposal of the armament industry.
"It has been disclosed that the NN prisoners already employed in the armament industry, as for instance the 400-odd prisoners working in Laband, have done a very good job and excel in particular as skilled workers. The armament industry therefore, wants to retain the employed NN prisoners also after their acquittal or after they have served their sentence.
"I ask for a decision on whether and, if soo how that demand can be complied with. Considerable doubts arise from the fact that there is no legal right to confine them further and that the judicial authorities would thus take preventive police measures. There is the question, however, whether the situation of the Reich does not justify even such extraordinary measures."
This request was handled by defendant von Ammon, who endorsed it as follows:
"Submitted ******first to Department V (headed by defendant Engert) with the request for an opinion. If you have no objections I intend to contact the RSHA in accordance with the report of the Attorney General at Kattowice."
CLEMENCY IN THE NN CASES As Under-Secretary, defendant Klemm was required to pass upon clemency matters either while acting with or in the absence of the Minister of Justice.
He admits passing upon clemency pleas in NN death cases and refusing all of them. Fourteen documents concerning NN matters passed through defendant Klemm after he became Under-Secretary of State. He knew of the transfer of NN cases from Essen to Silesia and knew of "routine" NN procedures which passed through his department.
As Under-Secretary, defendant Rothenberger also passed upon clemency matters in NN cases along with other clemency pleas. Defendant Mettgenberg testified that the Minister of Justice instructed him with special clemency proceedings in 1944 because of the escape of prisoners under death sentence during air raids.
He states:
"He called up Under-State Secretary Rothenberger by telephone and ordered him to receive reports concerning persons under death sentence in the ordinary manner, and to make the decisions concerning their execution. This was done. Individual cases were presented in reports lasting hours, to Under-State Secretary Rothenberger who then made the decisions."
In the fall of 1944 Hitler ordered the discontinuance of the NN proceedings by the justice and the OKW courts and transferred the entire problem to the Gestapo the NN prisoners being handed over to the Gestapo at the same time. In later conferences attended by defendants von Ammon, the Ministry of Justice agreed to and later actually carried out the transfer by committing them from the Ministry's prisons to the Gestapo's custody. Defendant Lautz was ordered to suspend People's Court proceedings against NN prisoners and transfer them to the Gestapo. The witness Hocker stated that those NN prisoners of the Berlin District, of which he had knowledge, were sent to Oranienburg.
The final order of the Ministry of Justice committing all NN prisoners on hand to the Gestapo and the concentration camps was one of extreme cruelty.
The foregoing documents and the undisputed facts show that Hitler and the high-ranking officials of the armed forces and of the Nazi Party, including several Reich Ministers of Justice and other high officials in the Ministry of Justice, judges of the Nazi regime's courts, the public prosecutors at such courts, either agreed upon, consented to, took a consenting part in, ordered or abetted, were connected with the Hitler NN plan, scheme, or enterprise involving the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the waging of the recent war against the Allied nations and other neighboring nations of Germany.
The foregoing documents and facts show without dispute that several of the defendants participated to one degree or another either as a principal, or ordered or abetted, took a consenting part in, or were connected with the execution or carrying out of the Hitler NN scheme or plan. The defendants so participating will be later discussed in the summation of the evidence.
The Night and Fog decree originated with Hitler as a plan or scheme to combat alleged resistance movements against the German occupation forces but it was early extended by the Ministry of Justice to include offenses against the German Reich. Often the offenses had nothing to do with the security of the armed forces in the occupied territories. May of them occurred after military operations had ceased and in areas where there were no military operations. The first secret decree of the Ministry of Justice for the execution or carrying out of the NN decree provided for:
"(1) the prosecution of criminal offenses against the Reich; or "(2) the occupation troops in occupied areas."