Images for this document are not yet available.
Use the mouse wheel to zoom, click to drag/move
Use the mouse wheel to scroll, click to zoom
Click to expand image full screen
Defendants' reply to the prosecution's brief on the law, arguing that the Balkan nations' resistance to German occupation was illegal and that the partisans were not belligerents under the law; annex on the Italian forces and the doctrine of military necessity
NMT 7
Authors
Stefan Fritsch (defense attorney, NMT)
Stefan Fritsch
lawyer; Nuremberg Trial defense attorney
- Born: 1907-01-01 (Międzyrzec Podlaski)
- Occupation: lawyer
- Member of political party: Nazi Party (period: 1940-01-01 through 1945-01-01)
- Participant in: Pohl Trial (role: criminal defense lawyer)
- Significant person: Johannes Baier (role: client, criminal defense lawyer)
- Residence: Andechs
Date: 14 December 1947
Literal Title: Military Tribunal V Case No. 7 The United States of America against Wilhelm List and others[.] Reply to the Prosecution's Brief on the Law of 5.XI. 1947
Total Pages: 95
Language of Text: English
HLSL Item No.: 151773
Notes:The reply answers "Prosecution's Memorandum of Law" on the German occupation and partisan resistance, by Theodore Fenstermacher (for Telford Taylor), 5 November 1947. Pages 48 and 87 of the Reply are missing. The argument does not concern or refer to individual defendants.